Gandhis Contribution to World War I Essay Example for Free

Gandhis Contribution to World War I Essay Why? 1)He had begun to approve of the idea of home rule, but he had no interest in exchanging government by British elite for rule by an Anglicized Indian elite. If swaraj was to come to India, he argued, it must come as part of a wholesale social transformation that stripped away the old burdens of caste and crippling poverty. 2)Gandhi had said – â€Å"I felt then that it was more the fault of individual officials than of the British system, and that we could convert them by love. If we would improve our status through the help and cooperation of the British, it was our duty to win their help by standing by them in their hour of need. 3)He had been almost alone among Indian leaders who had argued for unconditional support to Britain in her hour of need in the hope of a worthy gesture at the end of the war. 4)The issue in Champaran involved European traders forcing illegal dues and payments upon the peasants; Ahmedabad’s problem was centred on the unfair treatment of industrial workers; and the predicament in Kheda was caused by the government ignoring the farmers’ appeals for the remission of land revenue. Gandhi solved each dilemma using unique, yet effective methods which gained him the respect and commitment of many political workers. These events depict the growing unrest in India very clearly. India was itching to fight for independence, which would be a very bloody battle indeed. Gandhi, therefore, decided to support the British Empire in the war, hoping that in return, India would gain independence. What? 1)In April 1918, during the latter part of World War I, the Viceroy invited Gandhi to a War Conference in Delhi. Gandhi agreed to actively recruit Indians for the war effort.[43] In contrast to the Zulu War of 1906 and the outbreak of World War I in 1914, when he recruited volunteers for the Ambulance Corps, this time Gandhi attempted to recruit combatants. In a June 1918 leaflet entitled Appeal for Enlistment, Gandhi wrote To bring about such a state of things we should have the ability to defend ourselves, that is, the ability to bear arms and to use themIf we want to learn the use of arms with the greatest possible dispatch, it is our duty to enlist ourselves in the army.† 2)Early in 1918, the war seemed to be going badly for the Allies; a German thrust was expected on the western front, and the Viceroy summoned prominent leaders of Indian opinion to a War Conference in Delhi. Gandhi supported the resolution on recruitment with a single sentence in Hindi: With a full sense of my responsibility, I beg to support the resolution. 3)When World War I broke out, Gandhi was on the high seas, he was homeward bound, though he hoped to spend a few weeks in England. On August 6, 1914, he landed on English soil and lost no time in calling a meeting of his Indian friends to raise an ambulance unit Public opinion 1)Gandhi did not favour a bargain with the government by offering cooperation at a price and said: That we have been loyal at a time of stress is no test of fitness for swaraj (self-government). Loyalty is no merit. It is a necessity of citizenship all the world over. 2)During the years 1916-18, Gandhi did not take active part in politics. The Moderates did not like his extra-constitutional methods of Satyagraha, the Extremists did not like his studied tenderness to the British Government during the war Consequence And having fought a war whose supposed purpose was to protect the rights of small states and independent peoples from tyranny, the rhetoric of British rule in India had begun to ring hollow 1)In this atmosphere, the harried British government made a frightful mistake. They elected to follow the recommendations of the Rowlatt Committee, which advocated the retention of wartime restrictions in India–including curfews and the suppression of free speech. Gandhi, reading the soon-to-be-passed Rowlatt Act in his sickbed, was too weak to mount a protest, but his loyalty to the Empire, which he had long viewed as the guarantor of Indian liberties, suffered a major blow. 2)Gandhi learned through the Sedition Committee Report that the government of India was going to introduce legislation to curb civil liberties. All of the Indian soldiers lost their lives in vain because the British Empire had absolutely no plans to give India its freedom. 3)Heartbroken, India grew more and more restless. When General Dryer heartlessly slaughtered 379 people at Jallianwala Bagh, the country could take no more. Awhile later, Gandhi launched a nation-wide struggle. And finally, on August 15th, 1947, India finally won its independence. 1)Charlie Andrews confirms, Personally I have never been able to reconcile this with his own conduct in other respects, and it is one of the points where I have found myself in painful disagreement.[46] Gandhis private secretary also had acknowledged that The question of the consistency between his creed of Ahimsa` (non-violence) and his recruiting campaign was raised not only then but has been discussed ever since. 2)They wondered, could the apostle of peace ask them to take up arms in defense of the Raj? About 1.3 million Indian soldiers fought in the war. 47, 746 soldiers died and 65, 126 were wounded from the Indian army. This doesn’t seem like something Gandhi would want, right? Many people wonder why Gandhi wanted Indians to fight, since he always strictly adhered to non-violence. His support for India’s involvement in World War One causes us to question his consistency and perhaps even his belief in ahimsa. 3)He did, however, stipulate in a letter to the Viceroys private secretary that he personally will not kill or injure anybody, friend or foe

Two-Way Monologues An examination of Keneally?s The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith through Friel?s Translations :: essays research papers

Two-Way Monologues An examination of Keneally’s The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith through Friel’s Translations If medium is the message, as suggested by Marshall McLuhan, much can be said about the difference between a novel and a play. As he explains, the medium is an extension of human facility, â€Å"The wheel...is an extension of the foot. The book is an extension of the eye... Clothing, an extension of the skin...† (McLuhan). Thomas Keneally’s novel The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith explains this phenomenon as Jimmy’s chant. It is not only what drives Jimmy, but it is a manifestation of proven and perceived social malfunctions. This chant is an extension of Jimmy, and it is therefore his message. Where Keneally is able to flesh out a complex main character with intense actions and conflicting inner monologues in his novel, Brian Friel is restricted to the format of a play in Translations. Using this medium, Friel must elaborate different emotions through different characters, many of whom have attributes similar to Jimmy Blacksmith.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  At their core, both stories are fictionalized accounts of true events. British imperialism is the similar theme in each, and both elaborate on the destruction of society and the reaction of the indigenous peoples. Translations illustrates the attempted dissolution of the Irish culture by British solders. Map makers are sent to survey and re-inscribe the entire island of Ireland. This is clearly an attempt at revising history, and erasure of the Irish’s sense of the past. In this case, the existence of culture acts as the medium, and is an extension of their way of life. More specifically names of towns on the maps are quickly being translated from Irish to English, effectively changing both the medium, and the message. This cultural genocide is something that is comparable to the human genocide that prefaced The Chant of Jimmy Blacksmith.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  After a large percentage of aboriginal tribes were destroyed by the British in Australia, the remaining natives were subject to horrible treatment; effectively killing their spirit and their history. The result of these actions are reflected upon Jimmy Blacksmith. He is pulled between different factions, but is truly guided by an ominous and treacherous voice. Keneally is able to develop an extremely complex character within the breadth of the novel, where as Friel had to work within the limits of writing a play. He is unable to express deep narration or inner monologues within the confines of a stage, so his solution is to represent different perspectives through naturally one sided characters.

Is Technology Making Us Crazy Essay

We strongly accept the author’s view that technology is making us crazy. This is because, there are many negative effects in human daily lives. Negative effects are exposing the youth to the elements outside or yellow culture which does not benefit the youth themselves. The internet is an endless ocean of information, entertainment and social media, and combined together, the three form a compelling and near irresistible to use the internet and make it an integral part of our daily lives. Is technology making us crazy? †. Technology and internet also can make us feel lonely and depressed both of which effects the mental aspect of an individual. For example, they do not giving pay full attention when people talk to them. In addition, they surf the internet for long periods of time which can invite people to mental health problems as well as physically. For example, it may worsen eye quality, have back pain and have a permanent effect on our body posture. We also agree with the statement from the writer who claims that research done showed that use technology appears that excessive could rewire our brains in a negative way if kept unchecked. In a nutshell, we fully agree with the author’s that technology is making us crazy. We always spend a lot more hours looking at the screen than doing anything else over 24 hours in daily lives. Hence, we should be worried about the state of our mental health. Lastly, as they say, every good thing is complemented by something bad. I strongly agree with the author’s view that more phones than books in the hands of the young. This is because owning a mobile phone is like a basic right for teens these days. Teens now also cannot live without new gadgets in their life. For example, they are interested to get new gadgets such as tablets, androids, iPad and others. So, they spend their time more with the handphones and gadgets than books. Besides that, there are more phones than books in hands of the young now because the latest mobile phones are very trendy and stylish looking, which grabs the attention of the youngsters. For example, mobile phones also have an exceptional camera with large megapixels, that enable them to listen to music, watch movies, and communicate or surf the web. Teens like mobile phones because it more than books that have hundred pages for them to read. On the other hand, we also agree with the author that the world is changing including young children. This is because more young children nowadays have their own phones than books. Most of their time are spend with their phones rather than books. They like to play with their phones as phones are interesting, attractive and fun. This is because phones are compiled with games and many cool applications. This bring to the neglect of more beneficial activities such as reading books. Information from books can be obtained through phones as well, especially if teens have wifi in their phones. They are not interested to read books. Beside that, they will get more information quickly through their phones. Such as, facebook, twitter, yahoo messenger, blog and so on only at finger tips. So that, books become a little boring to read for them. If they read through phones, they can listen to music while reading and studying at the same time. It makes they feel more relaxed to read too. In addition, the young now think owning mobile phones can increase their studies without using books. When they need to review books, they do not have to go to the library to find and read books because it is a waste time. They just have to surf the web through their phones to find the information. The latest technology now makes them feel like want to get own gadgets like mobile phones rather than books.

Effects of Divorce on Children - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 491 Downloads: 8 Date added: 2019/06/24 Category Psychology Essay Level High school Tags: Divorce Essay Did you like this example? Over the past several years the rate of marriages that end in divorce had been increasing drastically. After a marriage is over kids are impacted in many ways and its not always emotional. Its an impact on kids of all ages are can last short or long term. Many parents go through a bad divorce with the littlest of acknowledgment to their children and how they would feel after. Kids have shown the sign of blaming themselves over the divorce saying it was their fault and that they couldve done more to prevent it. Adjusting in areas of social relationships, there are more common behavioral problems which impacts the children. Children have to adjust from living in one house with two parents to splitting their way to two homes. Most commonly the mother has the rights to the child and the father will get visiting rights. This causes strain for such child. Shifting kids from one house to the next that has different customs and rules confuse the kid on what they can and cannot do. Parents who are split has less communication between the child and can cause behavioral problems with the lack of parenting. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Effects of Divorce on Children" essay for you Create order Couples seek divorce for many reasons, many being wanting happiness again and for their child. When going through a divorce the parents tend to not focus on the child and that they are potentially hurting them, from the fighting, yelling, and in the end the split. Kids who have split parents could go to doing harmful stuff like drugs and alcohol, which in the future could lead to death or substance abuse. These negative actions could have long-term effects on the child. Children from split homes suffer during school and with grades. They have high levels of not graduation at the right age. Their grades suffer as well. Kids from broken homes are more likely to commit crimes as a juvenile. Because the parents are split income only comes one way and the kids are five times more likely to live in poverty than those with both present parents. Teens will turn to drugs and alcohol and engage in sexual intercourse at a younger age. Children tend to get sicker and recovery time is much slower due to stress and anxiety. This is an example of a study done on kids who have divorced parents. Phycologist Judith Wallerstein studied a group of kids in broken homes from 1970 to 1990. Interviewing a group of kids that recently got divorced parents for 20 years after the splitting, the hope of the outcome was for the kids to no longer be affected. But even after 25 years of the divorce the now grown up kids still go through the fear of failure, loss, conflict, and change. In conclusion, kids could be affected in many ways after a tough divorce, and there are always different ways to ease the situation and work it out with them. This can decrease the long-term effects.